The Scarlett Johansson Project — #2

Being quarantined at home may be the perfect time to look back on a movie that explores loneliness and connection. This was obviously not something I planned, but social distancing has a way of making us look at things differently and that includes the way we experience certain movies. That’s what’s happening with me and the classic romantic comedy Lost in Translation (2003) anyway.

I have a lot of love for this movie and I do think the feelings it evokes are intensified by this interruption in normal social life we are going through. Lost in Translation is a bittersweet story focused on two kindred spirits floating through weird periods of their lives. Neither know what they want, and both happen to meet in a foreign city and find something in each other that bonds them in a profound way. Lost in Translation featured a 17-year-old Scarlett Johansson alongside comedic great Bill Murray, who was stepping into a dramatic role for the first time in nearly 20 years. Director Sofia Coppola was completely blown away by the reception her movie received, feeling certain it would be viewed as pretentious and self-serving. It ended up netting her an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay that year.

In rewatching it in preparation for my monthly feature, I had forgotten how fleeting Lost in Translation really is — it’s all wrapped up in about 96 minutes. What happens within that time, however, what is said (and almost as often, what is not said), makes it so hard for me to leave the movie behind. I simply love these characters, especially when they’re together.

Scarlett Johansson as Charlotte in Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation

Role Type: Co-lead

Premise: A faded movie star and a neglected young woman form an unlikely bond after crossing paths in Tokyo. (IMDb)

Character Background: Charlotte is a native New Yorker and recent college grad who is feeling unsatisfied and disillusioned with her marriage to John (Giovanni Ribisi), a celebrity photographer. On assignment in Tokyo, he’s kept busy and away from the hotel room leaving Charlotte alone and with plenty of time to wonder why she ever married this guy. She’s empty inside and her wandering eyes say as much. So she gets out into the city and does some exploring, soon turning acquaintances into friends, such as Charlie Brown (Fumihiro Hayashi). Over the course of about a week she also forms a deep connection with an older man named Bob Harris (Murray), a fading actor who’s staying at the same hotel while he endures a dreadful commercial shoot promoting whiskey. It is through their meaningful conversations and one really fun night soaking up the nightlife that we learn more about her and see her personality open up a bit more.

What she brings to the movie: very little experience for a role that aged her up 4 years from what she actually was. When Lost in Translation started shooting Scarlett Johansson was only 17 and had but a handful of acting credits total. Her claims to fame at the time were a starring role in Terry Zwigoff’s Ghost World (2001) and a supporting role in the Robert Redford drama The Horse Whisperer (1999). Charlotte is her first adult role as far as the emotional complexities involved and the thematic content. Yes, it is true that Sofia Coppola would not have made this movie had she not been able to get Bill Murray, but Coppola also enjoyed Johansson’s performance in the 1996 comedy Manny & Lo so much she had to land her as a lead in one of her movies (Johansson would pass on Coppola’s début effort The Virgin Suicides, feeling it wasn’t right for her at the time).

In her own words: [on the age difference between her and Bill Murray, who is more than 30 years her senior] “It was hard to relate to one another, but I think what worked is that when the cameras were rolling and [it] actually came time to do the work, we worked really well together.”

Key Scene: I mean . . . there are other choices. There’s a really nice moment when Bob and Charlotte are talking while laying on a bed, having a deep conversation about whether life or marriage get any easier as time goes by. It’s a quiet but important moment that further solidifies their bond. But the key scene is in the way Sofia Coppola brings this wonderful week to a close. The kiss that almost never was, the mystery of whatever it is that Bob whispers into Charlotte’s ear. The sounds of the streets teeming with passing strangers. By the time The Jesus and Mary Chain come in with “Just Like Honey,” it’s very close to a perfect ending. Well, it’s one of the most bittersweet endings I’ve ever seen anyway. I never wanted this story to end, and yet Coppola does it about as gracefully as she possibly could have. According to her, “I just wanted to show a whole relationship just in a few days.”

Rate the Performance (relative to her other work): 



All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.

Photo credits: IMDb


8 thoughts on “The Scarlett Johansson Project — #2

  1. Oh and thanks for pointing out the typo. I can’t read my own writing haha. It was suppsoed to say different, not difficult ha. Thanks for highlighting it. Have changed it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oh haha! That makes more sense! I was just thinking it was maybe an expression I had never heard before or something. Lol glad to be of help, albeit inadvertently.


    • In Good Company is another one I’m considering. I’m looking for roles that are fairly substantial. The Man Who Wasn’t There (which I just now saw) is about as small a role as I would want to talk about.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I aint heard of this one, though I aint really a fan of Scarlett. I only ever liked her in under the skin, and also (and am surprised you didn’t mention) The Man Who Wasn’t There, which was prior to this as well.

    Is this a typical sorta film of the genre or does it have some originality/weirdness etc to it?

    Liked by 1 person

    • You haven’t heard of Lost in Translation? What!

      I would describe it as a very atypical romantic comedy. The relationship is very natural but clearly there is an element of the taboo involved, with Charlotte being something like 21 and Bob being in his 50s or something. Not so sure it is a movie you’d enjoy, but it’s definitely one of Coppola’s that I will always love.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I was a fan when it first came out. It’s one I should revisit. Your review reminds me of the charm and unlikely connection between the characters of Scarlett and Bill Murray. Wow. 17. She was/is so beautiful. And only the beginning of a wide variety of roles before her. She’s right up there in the top 5 of my favorite working actresses.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It’s such a charming movie. I had a lot of fun revisiting it, and yes Johansson is just so impressive with how she plays this character at such a young age. You could tell she was destined for big things. She’s such a big part of what makes this movie so great for me. The subtle performances are truly wonderful.


Comments are closed.