First Man

Release: Friday, October 12, 2018

👀 IMAX Theater

Written by: Josh Singer

Directed by: Damien Chazelle

Starring: Ryan Gosling; Claire Foy; Jason Clarke; Kyle Chandler; Corey Stoll; Christopher Abbott; Ciarán Hinds

Distributor: Universal Pictures




While First Man is only a small step into a different genre for director Damien Chazelle, the way he tells the story of the Moon landing may well represent a giant leap for fans of his previous, more emotionally-driven work. The historical reenactment is uncharted territory for the maker of dream-chasing dramas Whiplash and La La Land, yet the obsessive, single-minded pursuit of a goal makes it feel thematically akin. Told from the point of view of Neil Alden Armstrong, First Man offers an almost purely physical, visceral adventure. Strap in and hold on for dear life.

For the first time since Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk I left a movie exhilarated and fulfilled but also a little jelly-legged . . . and A LOT concerned about the state of my ears and the quality of service they would henceforth be able to provide. I guess what I am saying is that the movie gets loud, but that’s underselling it. In intermittent yet unforgettable bursts First Man comes close to overwhelming the unsuspecting moviegoer with its sonic power. All that style isn’t just for show, though Oscar surely will come a-knockin’ on Chazelle’s door next February. By way of aural and visual disorientation he creates an immersive experience that makes us feel our vulnerability, our loneliness and limitations on the final frontier.

It’s apparent from the stunning opening scene that Chazelle intends for us to feel this one in our bones rather than our hearts. A brutal tussle between Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) and his X-15 rocket plane which keeps bouncing off Earth’s atmosphere sets the stage for the challenges to be faced later. This early chaos provides a formal introduction to the physicality of First Man, while reaffirming the mythology around the actual man. How he survives this ordeal is a feat in and of itself. Once back on terra firma the deconstruction of that mythology begins. Guided through seven tumultuous years leading up to the mission itself, we gain privileged access to Armstrong’s domestic life — that which became all but sealed off completely to the public after the Moon landing — as well as a better understanding of events that paved the way for an American victory in the space race.

In First Man there isn’t a lot of love being thrown around, whether it’s Armstrong’s awkwardness around his family when it comes to saying goodbye, or the way the public has come to view NASA and its affinity for spending money and costing lives. Working through the troubleshooting days of the Gemini program (1964 – ’66) before moving on to the more technologically advanced but still flawed Apollo missions, First Man has less time for romanticizing and fantasizing. The stakes couldn’t have been higher, and America needed to know: how many astronauts are expendable in the interest of getting one over the Russians? All the while Gosling’s traditionally Gosling-y performance doesn’t allow us to get particularly attached to his character. All of these factors contribute to a rather disconcerting experience as we never get very comfortable on Earth, never mind in a coffin built out of aluminum and traveling at 17,000 miles an hour.

The film isn’t without its moments of raw emotion. An early scene depicts the tragic loss of two-year-old daughter Karen to cancer, and for a brief moment Neil Armstrong is in shambles. Logic and reason have completely failed him. Claire Foy is excellent as wife Janet, who becomes the closest thing we get to an audience surrogate while her husband grieves in his own way by burying himself in math and physics homework. But even her tough exterior sustains serious damage as time goes on and both NASA and Neil’s lack of openness with her as well as their two sons becomes ever more a source of frustration. Our feelings more often than not align with hers.

Elsewhere, Armstrong’s aloofness is noticed by fellow Apollo hopefuls Ed White (Jason Clarke), Elliott See (Patrick Fugit) and Buzz Aldrin (Corey Stoll) who each befriend him to a certain extent but are never quite able to crack the code of really getting to know him. His fears, his doubts. His favorite men’s magazine. His aspirations beyond walking on Earth’s lonely satellite. (As an aside, several of the astronauts from the Apollo missions went on to pursue political careers, but Armstrong went the other way, withdrawing from public life and even refusing to autograph items when he learned his signatures were being forged and that those forgeries were being sold all over the globe.) Stoll is a bit more fun as the extroverted Aldrin, the second man to walk on the Moon — the inventor of the Moon bounce, if you will — though he hardly inhabits the man in the way Gosling does.

Adapted from the book by James R. Hansen, First Man is a story of ambition delivered in blunt fashion. It isn’t a sexy, glamorous tale of fame or even nobility. This isn’t a story about a nation claiming its stake on a distant, lifeless rock. Nor is it about mankind advancing itself, despite what was said when boot met Lunar soil. This is an account of what it cost one man, one civilian, to get to the Moon. And the physical stresses, while pronounced in the film, are only a part of the deal. Often Linus Sandgren’s camera harries the subject rather than deifying or celebrating him. Certain angles rob the guy of personal space while tracking shots of him heading towards some vehicle or other give the impression of the paparazzi in constant pursuit. Neil’s always on the move, busy with something, and inquiring cameras need to know.

First Man is certainly not the film a lot of people will be expecting, be it the distance put between the audience and the astronaut or the scenes Chazelle chooses to depict (or not depict). Flag planting or no flag planting, this feels like the story that should have been told. It feels like a privilege to have experienced it.

I’ll see you on the dark side of the Moon

Moral of the Story: First Man uses a typically enigmatic Ryan Gosling performance to create an altogether lonelier feeling historical drama. In retrospect, the release comes at an odd time. Next summer will be the 50th anniversary of the Lunar landing, so I’m not sure why First Man is coming out right now. Not that a few months makes that much of a difference, when you have a dishearteningly large percentage of the public believing A) we never went or B) the whole thing was a colossal waste of time. Fair enough, I guess. Those with a more open-mind, however, are strongly encouraged to experience First Man in IMAX. 

Rated: PG-13

Running Time: 141 mins.

Quoted: “What are the chances you’re not coming back? Those kids, they don’t have a father anymore! So you’re gonna sit the boys down, and prepare them for the fact that you might never come home!”

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited. 

Photo credits:;


15 thoughts on “First Man

  1. Pingback: Top That! My Ten Favorite Films of 2019 | Thomas J

  2. I really enjoyed this unique take on the moon landing through the eyes of Neil Armstrong. I like how you out the motion is subdued, but it’s still an emotional work. So good, but oh how I wish I had seen this on IMAX.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oh dude, the IMAX was the way to go on this one! Let me tell you, that opening sequence and the Lunar landing of course — simply sublime. I was right there with him. I was a little dubious as to whether the entire picture would really justify paying $17 for an IMAX ticket, but there were a number of sequences throughout that really put you in that rocket ship. I’d have to say the same effect would be there regardless of the theater screen, but like Alfonso Cuaron’s Gravity, I’m not sure how well the physicality of the experience would translate to, say, a screen tucked into the back of a commercial airline seat. 😉

      Glad you liked this too. I heard so many people hate on it. C’est la vie.

      Liked by 1 person

        • Several patrons in my theater actually booed the film at the end. They wanted the flag planted. They didn’t get it. So they booed. I wish I were kidding.

          And the internet has been all over Chazelle for that scene and in general, creating revisionist history. Drives me nuts.


    • It definitely paces itself patiently but there are those moments that are so deafeningly loud and physically brutal that startle us. Its crazy to me that he made a drama about something we know the ending to so well, but still makes us feel in those moments like we might not make it.


  3. Pingback: Month in Review: October ’18 | Thomas J

  4. Really glad you enjoyed this movie. I did love it for many of the things people have criticized it for. And you are 100% right – the IMAX screen (and sound) is the way to go. I saw it the second time in IMAX. It was my son’s first viewing and we were both blown away. Really sad that it didn’t get much attention at the box office.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It was utterly exasperating the criticisms this film faced. I can’t help but think the flag controversy affected the numbers. Beyond that, I guess the Moon landing era has had its time and people just aren’t interested in it anymore. I mean, it was telling back in the 70s when, after the success of Apollo 11, the TV ratings for successive launches dropped like a stone. The public has had 50 years to only become further jaded by NASA. It really is a shame. I think this movie did justice to the bravery involved, the personal sacrifices that need to be made. I really dug it, especially as it felt like an entirely different Damien Chazelle film.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Couldn’t have said it better myself. An extremely internalized performance. I remember your review of it from a couple weeks ago. It gave me pause that this movie wasnt going to connect like it ought to, but the guy really impressed me. Those are huge shoes to fill


  5. Yes, it’s crazy to me that people think we never went. Waste of time? I get that, too. It’s a struggle to handle the practical issues at home (pay for it) and put money into the dreams and ideals of what America stands for. I got choked up over the Kennedy speech and his prediction we would beat the Russians to the moon. It was an inspirational, colossal achievement which today seems like a nostalgic event. I have a friend whose son is literary a rocket scientist. He’s part of next year’s launch to Mars. I think it’s human nature to migrate, to explore, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go…Ha! I’ll stop.
    I liked the movie as much as you did.


    • I love space exploration. It fills me with hope that there is something else out there beyond our world. I’m with you all the way — it’s human nature to do these things. Curiosity is what brought Columbus to the West Indies, and I can only imagine there was a sizable percentage who felt his voyage wasn’t in the Spaniards best interest. So I think it is also human nature to want to remain ignorant, to feel safe in one’s own insularity. When it comes to venturing into space, I can at least appreciate someone’s skepticism about some of the things we are learning about our place in the grand scheme. Sometimes the truth isn’t easy to accept. Some people can’t handle the truth . . . . . . 😉


Comments are closed.