The Circle

Release: Friday, April 28, 2017

→Theater

Written by: James Ponsoldt; Dave Eggers

Directed by: James Ponsoldt 

I don’t know if “knowing everything is better” but I do know that The Circle is an experience I need not have again. I wish I never even had it. A parable about the dangers of being too plugged in to the digital world does little to justify both your time and its high-profile, talented cast.

Director James Ponsoldt, known for his sensitive character studies like The End of the Tour and The Spectacular Now, adapts the 2013 Dave Eggers novel of the same name. Seemingly having little faith in the material itself he overhauls what could have been another indie sleeper hit with a one-sheet of Hollywood names guaranteed to create a box office draw. (He wasn’t wrong; rather than bombing, his latest has gone on to become his highest-grossing effort internationally.)

Emma Watson stars as Mae Holland, a young go-getter who lands an entry job with a powerful tech conglomerate known as The Circle, run by the visionary Eamon Bailey (Tom Hanks in a Mark Zuckerbergian capacity). The film traces Mae’s rise to prominence as she goes from Customer Service representative to the first Circler to go “fully transparent” — wearable cameras giving her followers access to her every waking moment. In the process it asks us where we draw the line between virtual popularity and physical privacy.

At the Circle, a Google-like campus where every amenity under the sun can be found, employees are encouraged to throw themselves headlong into their work. To get connected and not only stay engaged, but intensify that engagement in perpetuity. Everyone comes across passionate and friendly. Only the most motivated of millennials are able to thrive here. If you’ve ever seen a movie, you’ll see right through this front and recognize this idyllic community for the insidious, disingenuous construct that it is (a similar problem plagued Gore Verbinski’s A Cure for Wellness earlier this year).

Mae takes the job initially to help fund treatments for her father who suffers from multiple sclerosis (Bill Paxton in his final role) but it’s not long before that selfless nobility gives way to a more unhealthy obsession with her own status. Before she’s drunk on the same Kool Aid that all her colleagues have been binging on, most notably her obnoxious college friend (Karen Gillan) who helped her score that interview and with whom Mae’s inevitably thrust into direct competition. She soon realizes that the benefits of going transparent are too many to count, and wants her parents and even her friend Mercer (Ellar Coltrane), the latter notorious for staying off the grid, to adopt the technology and learn to become part of the Real World.

Mae’s meteoric rise is nurtured by Hanks’ unnaturally likable CEO, who sees great, scripted potential in his protégé. After catching her breaking the law via one of his recently installed SeeChange cameras — part of a new initiative to keep the entirety of humanity more accountable for their actions and behavior — Bailey decides to give her an opportunity to become her best self. Meanwhile, comedian Patton Oswalt is stuck delivering some spiel about how none of this will manifest as one giant middle finger in the face of national and international privacy rights. Like everyone else, he’s unconvincing.

The movie from here becomes such that I really wish Hanks had just fired Watson. The movie wouldn’t have made much sense but, critically, it would have been over sooner. Declining to actually do the unpleasantries is such a Tom Hanks thing to do, and he can’t even make reading the riot act to a disobedient employee an uncomfortable experience. He’s badly miscast, though no one in this movie comes out smelling like a rose. I think it’s this fact, how even Forrest Gump has been set up to look like a dope, that makes me more mad at The Circle than its obnoxious air of superiority or the way it turns relevant social commentary into a boring, predictable and downright condescending lecture.

Recommendation: On the grounds that this is the last movie featuring the great Bill Paxton, it pains me to tell people to avoid the movie. But avoid it. Avoid it like political commentary on social media. Avoid it like the comments section underneath actors’ profiles whenever they make a statement about something other than their chosen professions. Avoid it like you would avoid anyone who tells you they’re still active on MySpace. 

Rated: PG-13

Running Time: 110 mins.

Quoted: “We’re so f**ked.” 

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.

Photo credits: http://www.impawards.com; http://www.imdb.com 

Advertisements

28 thoughts on “The Circle

  1. Pingback: Month in Review: August ’17 | Thomas J

    • It’s almost inexplicable. Well, one tangible thing I can point to is the tone. But that is really an odd choice, too. Unless the book is like that . . . which makes me not want to read the book lol

  2. Pingback: Ingrid Goes West (2017) Review - That Moment In

  3. Pingback: Ingrid Goes West: Movie Man Jackson – MMJ

    • I’ve heard very mixed things about the Circle but unfortunately I fell on the negative side. A lot of wasted potential here I’m afraid. I’m glad I could be of help bud!

    • It’s good to hear from you Mark! Doing well. Getting back into the groove a bit, as you might have noticed. The gears are rusty but moving.

      And yes, I hate to say it since the cast is good (distractingly so as I mentioned), but the script just leaves a looooooot to be desired. . . .

  4. Ouch. Got this in my Netflix queue, still gotta check it out at some stage. The reviews are all over the show for this one. Great work!

    • I really didn’t like the tone it took. Nor the fact that few of the actors here are made to look good. The script in some places is just so bad. It is unfortunate for sure. But I do hope you will take more away from it than I did

    • I know it’s such a shame! Paxton delivers here, but the movie you gotta wade through for that I just didn’t find to be worthwhile. There is a great indie movie in here though. It baffles me why they went with such a distractingly famous cast

    • Ah darn. That’s a pity, I had heard that the book is actually quite good. I’m more inclined to check out his best selling debut (?) novel, A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius.

      • I’m not familiar with that one, but I was thinking of reading his novel A Hologram for the King, which was also turned into a Tom Hanks movie. Maybe Hanks is going to play in future Eggers adaptations as well?

        • I’d like to read Hologram too. I was bummed I missed that movie even though the general consensus didn’t seem to be good

  5. On a side note: I wish celebrities will just occupy themselves with being celebrities, and not be all political. Ugh.

    This movie sounds really lame. I’m just going to avoid as suggested 😉

    • This is an interesting debate. It might even be worth posting about. Whereas I understand fans want their favorite actor to, as we say, “stay in their lane” because often these people do NOT help a situation, only inflame it, I have to wonder how we get annoyed at these professionals for voicing opinions and yet we see politicians and athletes talking about movies and we find them somehow more human. We can relate to these people when they talk about stuff that’s not their chosen profession. Yet actors, I think mostly because of the type of office they work in, get shredded for doing the same.

      Personally I think, like all human beings with hopes, desires, fears and doubts that actors should be able to talk politics, but the same rules apply: it helps infinitely more if you’re saying something of substance and not just adding fuel to the fire. So many of us are guilty of that.

    • It was the tonality and the characters that didn’t work at all for me. This was a chore to get through, but I’ve heard good things about Eggers and remain willing to read his stuff. Definitely his first one.

Comments are closed.