Denial

denial-movie-poster

Release: Friday, September 30, 2016 (limited)

[Theater]

Written by: David Hare

Directed by: Mick Jackson

There’s no denying the spectrum of emotions Deborah E. Lipstadt experienced during her days in the Royal Court of Justice, recounted in her book History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier (upon which this film is based), deserves the silver screen treatment. Hers is a story that’s at once infuriating and inspiring, one that addresses the unfathomable but of course very real possibility of people denying that the Holocaust ever happened. Or, at the very least, that the aftermath was ever as devastating as it has been reported.

Denial represents director Mick Jackson (Volcano; L.A. Story)’s first theatrical release in almost 15 years. He has returned to craft a dignified if at times clunky dramatization that takes audiences through the harrowing Irving v. Penguin Books Ltd. court case, a trial that lasted for over a month as it painstakingly poured over details like the existence of Zyklon-B insertion points and the significance of Prussian blue — all things that confirm gas chambers were used to kill. You know, the sort of stuff that can’t possibly be denied but is anyway because it is a fundamental human liberty to express opinions in a free society.

Rachel Weisz digs deep and creates a brash but deeply sympathetic character as the embattled Deborah Lipstadt. The plaintiff in this case is notable historian David Irving (bravely portrayed by Timothy Spall). An English author who had written extensively on the military and political history of World War II with a particular emphasis on Nazi Germany, Irving began marginalizing himself in 1988 with his perpetuation of the notion that the Holocaust was a propagandistic tool designed and used by the Jews to gain financial benefits and public notoriety. In 1996 he sued Lipstadt for remarks she made in her recent publication Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory — remarks he believed to be damaging to both his personal and professional reputation.

As a defendant in the English legal system, where it’s Guilty Until Proven Innocent, Lipstadt carries the burden of proof; that is to say, yes, her legal team (chiefly comprised of litigator Anthony Julius and libel lawyer Richard Rampton QC, here portrayed by Andrew Scott and Tom Wilkinson respectively) has to prove that Irving’s rhetoric is reliant upon omission of facts and details, and that such omission of facts and details was deliberate. One cannot hope for victory over their opponent simply because he or she happens to be a Nazi sympathizer. Adding to her difficulties, Lipstadt is expressly told not to speak during court, that she cannot appear on the witness stand. Nor can any London-dwelling survivor of those camps. Including their testimonies would only aid the enemy. It would invite the possibility of public humiliation and unwanted complications.

Naturally, cameras linger close to Weisz as her composure informs the tone and attitude of the film. Her face becomes tight and twisted in disgust and frustration as the implications of her challenging Irving rather than choosing to settle out of court begin to overwhelm. Evidence of an emotionally hefty if not ultimately rewarding shoot is written all over the actor’s face especially as she goes out on her nightly runs — Weisz of course being born of Jewish immigrants. Denial is riddled with tension and fraught with emotional crevasses down which we journey. The film is at its most sobering when we visit Auschwitz. Her attorneys must gather evidence that gas chambers were used for mass murder rather than protection from incoming bombs. For some time her character isn’t even trusting of her own defense, who must frequently remind their client that becoming emotional in court will not help anything.

Despite some hiccups the case itself is intelligently and thoughtfully presented, and though a lot of legalese is included even in the few scenes that do not take place in court it’s not alienating. Rather than condescend, the meticulous attention to detail creates the cold and clinical air of detachment lawyers are meant to exude, no matter what cause they are rallying behind. Though in this case, a quiet righteous anger in Scott and Wilkinson simmers just below the surface.

It’s a competently shot and well-acted courtroom procedural even if the story that develops outside the walls of this hallowed institution stumbles over itself, a little too excited to arrive at its logical conclusion; to rightfully bathe in the glory of a just resolution to an ugly legal battle. Ultimately Denial is a straightforward presentation of a complex and seminal case in English law, one that is supposed to have revolved around libel and libel alone but which ends up delving into matters of historical accuracy, a directorial decision that will no doubt become a major point of contention for historians and viewers who fancy themselves history buffs. In a sense we should be thankful these creative liberties ultimately pave the way to predictability. To think that this saga would end any other way would be, in a word, unbearable.

timothy-spall-in-denial

Recommendation: Performances allow the film to rise above its narrative flaws. I’m finding myself more and more drawn to Rachel Weisz these days. She is an intense performer and her Deborah Lipstadt is a great example of her skill set. What a resilient individual this person was (and is). This is a film to watch for great contributions from the supporting cast as well, namely Tom Wilkinson and Andrew Scott. A heavy film, but surprisingly not as confronting as you might expect.

Rated: PG-13

Running Time: 110 mins.

Quoted: “This case is happening to you, but it’s not about you.”

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.

Photo credits: http://www.impawards.com; http://www.imdb.com 

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Denial

  1. This sounds like something different. Which is good! I also am finding myself liking Rachel Weisz more and more… ever since I saw The Lobster I think. Dunno when I’ll get a chance to see this but I’m putting on my list for recent films to look out for. There are so many…. half of them cos of you 😛 The Accountant is coming here for example.Oh oh, and Hell Or High Water finally played here! Duuude, you were so spot on, that movie is a real treat. And Nick Cave on the soundtrack, mixing his stuff with some great songs…. dude, so good. I’m with you on that one, full marks!!

    • Full f**king marks, indeed! Ah that was such a good time.

      As for this, it’s amazing to me how quiet it has been around here. I wasn’t expecting this to get Dr Strange levels of Likes or whatever ,but holy crap. It’s like no one has ever heard of this, which is weird. I liked Denial a lot.

      • Heh, I’ve long given up on trying to generate traffic man. It boggles my mind when I see blogs with 60+ comments and such. Hell, I just posted a review on Hacksaw Ridge, which we actually got earlier than the rest of the world, and that got like three comments. Perhaps it is because I don’t have the time any more to check out the blogs I used to, who knows.

        I hadn’t heard of Denial, but its sure on my radar now thanks to you 😀

        Oh, and another rec from you (kinda), I’m gonna give Hands of Stone a shot today. I can’t remember the score you gave it but I love boxing, gonna give it a shot

        • Hope you enjoy Hands of Stone. There’s certainly a lot worth watching there. Edgar Ramirez and Robert DeNiro most notably.

          • I have never heard of Edgar Ramirez. Always nice to see new, talented actors. Looking forward to watching it!

            As for Denial, it isn’t coming to our cinemas =/ Hopefully it is out on BR before the end of the year

            • Edgar Ramirez has been in a few things that I’ve seen but yeah he’s flying pretty well under the radar.

              Shame about Denial; it’s not the greatest thing ever but its certainly interesting and hope you will get a chance to see it. For me, I’m just itching itching itching to see some more indie stuff — The Hunt for the Wilderpeople; Captain Fantastic; Moonlight; Jackie; oh my god the list goes on. It’s depressing where I live; we don’t get jack!

              • Heh, tell me about it!! I was lucky cos Wilderpeople was made in NZ so we had a decent sized release of that, and we got Cap Fantastic a month or so ago. The others though don’t have any dates that they will hitting cinemas here =/ I’ve heard good things about Moonlight too

    • Denial is a pretty sturdy drama that tells an important story. I really dug it. But can’t believe I was the only one in the theater the night I saw it, and now this post is proving to be super unpopular. I don’t get it. :/

  2. Solid review! I had intended on seeing this last night but my scheduled ended up blown to bits. The cast does sound like money but I’m intrigued by its story. Good to hear the flaws you touch on don’t kill it.

    • Thanks dude, yes by no means do the shortcomings become a pr0blem. I did find a few lines of dialogue a little cringy as well but this is a powerful story that deserved to be told

Comments are closed.