Hail, Caesar!

'Hail Caesar!' movie poster

Release: Friday, February 5, 2016


Written by: Ethan Coen; Joel Coen

Directed by: Ethan Coen; Joel Coen

There’s a new Coen brothers film out in theaters and it is called Hail, Caesar! It chiefly depicts a day in the life of a 1950s Hollywood fixer, a man charged with ensuring that studio productions stay on track and avoid disruption or shut-down due to various intervening factors, not least of which being a movie star’s actions away from the set. Call it a function of public relations but this custodial role actually seems even more thankless.

As a modest Coen brothers fan, I bought a ticket. I watched as the film played. When it was over, I got up and headed for the exit. I got into my car and drove home. Such is the perfunctory, mechanical, obligatory, bland, boring manner in which the Coens chose to “make” their new film. This is a total head-scratcher, a real WTF-er.

All the elements seem to be in place for an uproarious, clever comedy. The talent is there behind the lens and the pens. The cast is the sort only directors with the kind of pull brothers Joel and Ethan now have can afford: Josh Brolin is the fixer, Eddie Mannix. George Clooney stars as Baird Whitlock, a name as epic as the film he’s starring in (you guessed it, Hail, Caesar!). Scarlett Johansson reinvests in her native New York accent playing DeeAnna Moran, the star of a spectacular water-themed production that will apparently involve lots of synchronized swimming, while Ralph Fiennes is a British director unhappy with a miscast  Hobie Doyle (Alden Ehrenreich) in his stage drama. Frances McDormand isn’t exactly Marge Gunderson this time around but she does have the distinction of being in the film’s funniest scene (and it is great). Channing Tatum plays a tap-dancing Communist and Tilda Swinton has a double role as twin sister journalists.

Oh yeah, I think I forgot Jonah Hill but that’s okay, because so did the Coens. Hill’s cameo barely registers as it seems to have already had its time in previews that have played to death the little flirty moment he gets to have with Johansson. No harm, no foul though. At least I can say Hill is consistently compelling with the two lines of dialogue he gets.

Hail, Caesar! can hang its hat on other things besides its staffing. Visually, it’s a beautiful piece and a love letter to the Golden Age of Hollywood. A sparkling sepia filter bathes the backlots of 1950s studios in a warmth that belies the business-like approach of both Brolin and the narrative at heart. But it’s not all glamorous, for the Coens seem to be indicting Big Business while celebrating the end product, the beauty of filmic imagery and the devotion of a cast to see its completion. Hail, Caesar! is, if nothing else, confirmation that the ‘magic of movies’ really lies in the sequence and number of phone calls a studio exec happens to make. But please, I turn to the Coens to be entertained, not educated. Or maybe I came to be educated, too, but I still put my needs in that order.

The film does very little entertaining. In fact it’s a surprisingly meandering, mindless affair where plot threads begin and taper off out of nowhere; where the comedy comes in spurts and the weirdness rules with an iron fist. Hail, Caesar! is perhaps at its worst when tracing Mannix’s single biggest problem of the day: locating and returning Baird Whitlock who gets kidnapped from his own trailer. This is a subplot that goes nowhere. A group of Communist sympathizers explain to Whitlock the arrogance of studio executives and how they get off on making millions for themselves (and their higher-ups) while never properly paying those who contributed their creative talents — several of the members of this clandestine group are screenwriters, you see — thus the reason why they are holding one of Hollywood’s biggest names for ransom.

Yeah — take that, you big meanies! This arc would have been compelling had it made any effort to engage the audience but philosophical and ideological ramblings (which seem to have this weird effect on the movie star) offer a painfully obvious exit for any theatergoer not well-versed in the Coens’ tendency to wander aimlessly every now and then. This time I don’t blame those people that couple for leaving; Hail Caesar! spends way too much time indulging.

And then it leaves such little time for other stories, such as DeeAnna’s concern over raising her soon-to-be-born child and Hobie Doyle’s aspirations. Mannix offers to protect the former’s image of having a baby out of wedlock (this is the 1950s, remember) by allowing her to put her baby up for adoption until she can claim it without the public becoming any wiser. Doyle is having a hard time fitting into a more talky role and must decide if he wants the western to define him as an actor or if he wants to grow and develop into something more. At least he seems to be comfortable finding a date to the premier of one of his own movies.

There’s another half-baked story involving entertainment beat reporters Thora and Thessaly Thacker — anyone notice a pattern yet? — in which both are morbidly curious about the disappearance of Capitol’s prized possession in Baird Whitlock, and both still have questions about his legitimacy as a star in the first place. Some scandal about sleeping with a male director to get a role early in his career? What? You could almost consider the Thacker sisters prototypes of the folks over at TMZ, their ability to show up at any time and out of thin air simultaneously alarming and amusing.

The Thackers’ presence is microcosmic of the Coens’ unusually tedious throwback: at its best it is a mildly amusing, grin-inducing gossip column. At its worst it is a waste of time, with some moments so dreadfully boring it’s a wonder how a film that’s critical of the film-making process managed to keep them in the final cut.

Screen Shot 2016-02-11 at 4.23.51 PM

Recommendation: One of the Coens’ weakest efforts to date, Hail, Caesar! has its moments but too often the laughs are lost in an unfocused narrative that spreads itself too thin across an arguably too ambitious cast. That said, those who are cast in the film fit right into the scene and do well with what material they have. There’s no such thing as a bad performance here but it’s been a long time since I’ve seen a cast this good fail to compel in any significant way. 

Rated: PG-13

Running Time: 106 mins.

Quoted: “Would that it were so simple . . .”

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.

Photo credits: http://www.impawards.com; http://www.imdb.com 

21 thoughts on “Hail, Caesar!

  1. My parents saw this last night and did not put in a good recommendation. That said, I’ve still seen a lot of mixed opinions. I think that is bound to happen with a Coen Brothers movie. It was good to read a more in-depth analysis here, especially since my parents’ review simply consisted of “it was the worst movie ever”, which… come on. haha

    Anyways, I love your blog, and hope that you not only check out mine, but that you keep up the great work and effort. I’ll for sure be back, and I look forward to reading more of your stuff! 🙂


  2. My review and reception was a bit warmer than yours, but not by much. (I’m not a Coen fanboy, but I have some favorites) Spot on job, Tom.


  3. First Keith and now you…. I’m the biggest Coen Bros fanboy and I seem to love the ones others hate…. so I’m hoping I’ll get more out of it… somehow. But 4/8, dayum. I’m still excited as hell to see it, but my expectations have been cut down immensely, which is probably for the best


    • I would always advise my readers that these thoughts are purely my own. I definitely did not get a lot out of Hail, Caesar! but bigger fans of the Coen brothers are probably going to. I don’t really know where I sit when it comes to their stuff, but I like them more often than not. I have to say though, my expectations were pretty high for this and they weren’t met but definitely give it a look and see what you make of it 🙂


    • This one has divided audiences like Moses splitting the Red Sea. I’d certainly be willing to sit through it again, see what I may have missed (as I actually dozed off in a few spots and I never, ever EVER do that. Well, okay, unless it’s a Terence Malick movie, too. 😉 ) I’d be interested to see what you think of this one.


  4. Fun scenes with the movie within movie (within movie?) setup, but nothing worth remembering. A fluffy love letter to 1950’s Hollywood, nothing more. Great analysis sir.


    • Yeah I agree man the movie seemed to be at its best in the movies set within it. I saw someone else make that comment too (and I read your review, so I think this was a third person who made the same point) and I never thought about that until now. There were one or two moments away from those parts that were hilarious on their own (I maintain that Frances McDormand’s tie getting pulled into the projector is the hardest I’ve laughed in a movie in several months). Wish this was more consistent though. And less self-indulgent on the weirdness. Channing Tatum as a communist? C’mon man


    • A few of them certainly have, yeah 🙂 haha. I think this was more of a letdown than The Big Short was; I had no idea what to expect with Adam McKay’s drama about the financial sector. I assumed that could have gone one of two ways. This one, a movie by the Coens? Oh, that’s for sure going to be a classic from 2016, right? Right??!!!


      Liked by 1 person

    • There are definitely those good things to look out for but there weren’t enough of those moments for me to rate this positively. It’s by no means a ‘bad’ film, just a supremely disappointing one.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Yes they can but more often than not I’ve liked their body of work. A few of theirs I am yet to see still but from what I have seen I’ve often really enjoyed their stuff. Hail, Caesar! is on the weaker end of the spectrum though. For me and seemingly for quite a few others. Some people I’ve talked to really have loved it though, so it’s the definition of a mixed bag experience


  5. Pingback: Top That: Ten directors whose next films I can’t wait to see | digitalshortbread

  6. I’ve read mixed opinions on this one but I’ll have to wait until March to get my viewing! DAMN international release dates! Though I am looking forward to Frances McDormand scene you teased. Nice review pal, shame you didn’t enjoy it a great deal


    • I enjoyed the parts that were good. When the comedy actually lands it hits pretty hard, but this is def one of their more self-indulgent pieces. And some story strands were just really too ridiculous for my liking. Thanks for reading James

      Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.