Release: Christmas Day 2015
[Theater]
Written by: Sean Anders; Brian Burns; John Morris
Directed by: Sean Anders
Will Ferrell may not yet be suffering late-stage DeNiro, but if he’s not careful he can still emasculate his career if he keeps up the habit of portraying people who get off on being abused by everyone else in the movie. He needs to go back to playing the egomaniac, his nice guy schtick just isn’t working.
In Daddy’s Home, the experiment to see whether Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg truly have chemistry or if The Other Guys was just a one-time thing, he plays the hapless (and almost hopeless) Brad Whitaker, a stepdad who really, really enjoys parenting. I suppose the suburban household remains one of the few domains his comedic antics haven’t yet targeted. Satirically speaking, the subject seems fitting; there’s something about the mundanity of parenting and living in a four-bedroom house, surrounded by a white picket fence that offers itself up to parody. And no, this isn’t me being sarcastic.
The movie is about Brad fighting for the right to be called ‘dad’ by his children. His domain is threatened when their biological father, a motorcycle-riding alpha male named Dusty Mayron (Wahlberg) — only a few letter changes away from being a Moron — suddenly reappears in their lives when he comes to visit them and his ex-wife Sara (Linda Cardellini) for a week.
As expected, a game of one-upmanship ensues, beginning with Dusty trying to win his children over with bedtime stories of heroics and a crisp $20 bill. Not to be outdone, Brad springs an impromptu Christmas upon the family. One of the gifts is a pony for his stepdaughter. Before long, Dusty’s taking off his shirt and doing one-handed pull-ups in the garage (fuck yeah bro, you totally win the Chiseled Abs award).
The nadir of this protracted pissing contest occurs when Brad clocks a cheerleader in the head with a basketball at the Lakers game, to which he takes the whole family assuming he finally has the upper hand. Unfortunately, he doesn’t factor in Dusty’s popularity, a privilege that grants the kids some face time with Kobe Bryant. Brad has seemingly overstepped a line and is temporarily booted from his own home. Le weep.
Brad Whitaker, who is introduced immediately as a man who has struggled with infertility after a freak accident at a doctor’s office some years ago, represents Ferrell at his most self-deprecating. It’s the epitome of a comedian softening in his older age. Ferrell’s less animated and more straight-laced in his portrayal of a suburbanite stepdad trying to do right by his family. It’s a role that simply doesn’t fit. Unfortunately his awkwardness isn’t the full extent of the issues with Anders’ latest.
Disregarding the mean-spirited nature of the comedy, Daddy’s Home also commits a genre-specific cardinal sin: it just ain’t that funny. Thomas Haden Church, as Ferrell’s boss at the Panda radio station, is absurdly annoying. Hannibal Buress has good comedic timing but is stuck with a character that offers precisely nothing of value. Linda Cardellini drowns in a pool of testosterone. And are the kids being spoiled twerps supposed to be some kind of commentary on modern consumerist behavior? Probably not, this movie isn’t that ambitious.
Good news is, Wahlberg, ever the American inamorato, continues being immune to enmity, even when his character is specifically written to incur it. He’s Ferrell’s opposite in every way, a guy we’re meant to be rooting against. Or, someone from whom maybe . . . just maybe, Brad could learn something as two different parenting styles — one a caring, loving presence and the other a total ghost — clash in a comedy that seems to think it’s humorous to debase a human being because of his inability to reproduce.
It’s a minor victory that Wahlberg and Ferrell work well together in their second collaboration, but I’m still not really laughing.
Recommendation: It’s a comedy with Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg in it, but the stars of the film are much easier to find than the comedy. The Other Guys is the superior outing, even though it’s not exactly comedy of the year either. Nonetheless, and somewhat strangely, the two have an easy chemistry that makes looking forward to their next project together more exciting than it probably should be. Here’s to hoping no more potential goes wasted.
Rated: PG-13
Running Time: 96 mins.
Quoted: “I’m a hot habenero pepper right now.”
All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.
Photo credits: http://www.impawards.com; http://www.imdb.com
You have a great writing style Tom. Keep up the good work. And by the way, I can’t stand Will Ferrell. I read somewhere he is the worst paid actor in HW. Go figure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah that’s too bad. I once really did like Ferrell but yeah, his stock is dropping in my book. He just needs to go back to playing more ridiculous characters. As weird as that may sound. Thanks for reading!
LikeLike
Ouchy, disappointing!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a flaming turd Emma, stay well away! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, I promise!!! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post. I had some expectations from this one and will probably see it still but my expectations have gone down considerably after reading the reviews.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah this one was just a big Douche Diaper in my book. I hated it
LikeLiked by 1 person
Le weep. That made me cackle! You also included one of my favourite words – inamorato/a. 🙂
I’m here doing a catch up today. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha! I always love when i see someone write ‘le – something,’ so I found a pretty funny way to put it in here I guess. Seriously though, I had a hard time feeling bad for anyone involved here. This movie was just dumb. Very disappointing.
I don’t mind the catching up part. Lord knows I have to do it on about 123,000 other blogs, so. . . .
LikeLike
I think I’ll save my money and watch something else as this sounds pretty bad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ferrell and Wahlberg are once again a good pairing but the material they’re working with here is so disappointing. And why the PG-13 rating, I wonder? If this was bumped up to R it could have helped. Who knows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the warning Tom, I’ll find something worthwhile to watch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like porn?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well there is that but I was referring to movies in the cinema.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, well. Porn is more important.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well it seems to be popular with many people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Multi-billion dollar industry with tremendous special effects and top-grade acting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now that really made me laugh Tom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I couldn’t make myself go see it and you’ve made me feel good about that decision. It looked so dopey! Every trailer or TV spot I saw just looked ridiculous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, I don’t know if I was just bored that day or what, but something was urging me to stay away too but for whatever reason I couldn’t resist. This review is more like me telling myself “I told you so.” lol
LikeLike
Dude, remember I reviewed The Ridiculous Six! I can’t say much!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The worst film I saw in all of 2015.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, it’s not very good is it? I don’t know if it would be that low on my list (I’m guessing you saved yourself the headache by skipping Mortdecai), but I think Get Hard was worse. That thing was terrible.
LikeLike