The Walk

Release: Friday, October 9, 2015

[Theater]

Written by: Robert Zemeckis; Christopher Browne

Directed by: Robert Zemeckis

In this episode of Remarkable Feats of Human Spectacle and/or Idiocy, Joseph Gordon Levitt balances on a one-inch thick steel cable rigged between the newly-constructed towers of the World Trade Center, looming steel giants that would go on to cast infinite shadows across Lower Manhattan in both a literal and metaphorical sense. Levitt portrays a man with an insatiable death wish, French high wire artist Philippe Petit, who, after coming across a magazine article in a dentist’s office about the towers, becomes obsessed with the idea of creating the “artistic crime of the century.”

If you like going to the circus, Robert Zemeckis’ sensationally goofy ode to stunt/suicidal men should sit right with you. The Walk tiptoes precariously between harmless popcorn entertainment and shameless exploitation, using Petit’s brazen decision to defy death in the most ridiculous way possible to remind the world once again of how terrible a day Tuesday, September 11, 2001 was. In fact, Zemeckis is so obsessed with recapturing what our world looked like physically prior to that day of darkness that I lost track of the number of vertical-panning shots of these most uninspired-looking structures.

If you’re not a fan of the circus, you may find The Walk to be, in the words of my generation, a shit show. Not in the traditional sense of the phrase, in that Petit or his many accomplices that he guilt-tripped into assisting him were perpetually drunk throughout the picture. Rather, this show is just shitty. It’s not particularly well acted (save for Levitt who, as per usual, is clearly dedicated to his craft), it drags for at least half the runtime and it tries to compensate for the recklessness by striking a fanciful tone. The whole thing comes dangerously close to being pointless as tension fails to be generated given we know the outcome before the opening scene spirits us away to Paris and before we’re inundated with a lot of exposition covering the man’s personal and early professional background.

During one of my many periods of zoning out I recalled when American daredevil Nik Wallenda deemed it a good idea to fix a line between a narrow section of the Grand Canyon and walk it without the aid of safety nets or harnesses. (These people view that kind of silly stuff as some form of emasculation.) If we’re talking entertainment value, there’s no comparison between waiting for this fairytale’s happy ending and realizing Wallenda’s walk carried with it the very real potential of having an actual death broadcast on television. Macabre? Maybe, but at least the threat was right there, making viewers the world over extremely uncomfortable for the better part of an hour. Some families reportedly didn’t allow their children to watch it. They’d be fine watching this, though. It’s completely kid-friendly, one of a small handful of aspects you can stick in the Positives column.

As The Walk progresses, something strange happens. As we draw ever closer to the red letter day (August 6, 1974) — that is to say, as Petit’s dream becomes more real — the less authentic this true story feels. Maybe it’s because the actor’s safety never being in question is too thinly veiled. Maybe it’s just because Levitt is such a nice guy he fails to convey the level of arrogance necessary to fully transform. (His accent doesn’t help, either.) Despite Dariusz Wolski’s breathtaking cinematography culminating in several vertigo-inducing shots as we dare look past Petit’s feet and into the abyss, more often than not the film is unable to escape its Hallmark movie channel sheen.

The Walk relies on the power of illusion. This is Barnum & Bailey on the big screen. If I had known that that was what I was paying to see I would have stayed home and forced myself to rewatch Man on Wire; of course that would mean having to endure the actual high wire artist’s grating cocksureness. In the end, I’m really not sure why I put myself through this. Maybe it’s me and not Petit that needs the psych evaluation.

Recommendation: I’ve said it once but I will say it again: if your circus experiences have served you well in the past, here’s another you can attend but this time from the confines of a theater chair. I suppose in some way The Walk is more than just the single act; it is a respectful tribute to the twin towers as well as reminder that it’s pretty impressive what people can do when they put their minds to it. But my recommendation comes down to something simple: whether or not you can stand listening to people say things like, “You gave that building a soul,” or “It’s amazing how you never gave up on your dreams.” If you cringe at stuff like that, then I think for you the carrots are cooked, as they say.

Rated: PG

Running Time: 123 mins.

Quoted: “The carrots are cooked.”

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.

Photo credits: http://www.impawards.com; http://www.imdb.com 

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “The Walk

  1. Nice, nice. Everybody I know who’s caught this says it’s basically so-so until the walk itself, which is supposedly outstanding. I suspect that if I watch this in the small screen, the impact will be lessened.

    • No doubt I took this one down a peg but hey, I had to! This was all kinds of gimmicky and awkward. Not least of which was the tone Zemeckis strikes, which, to be completely honest isn’t so very different from his other fare (I think I forget how whimsical Forrest Gump was and I absolutely love that one). But . . . I don’t know, this just didn’t work for me. Should’ve waited for a rental! Let me know what you think if you see it, please!!

  2. Haha wow. That was brutal. And I gotta say this movie doesn’t interest me in any way whatsoever. I mean, they’ve already told this story with Man on Wire and I dont see any way they could have told it better than that film.

    • Yeah honestly the docu was a pretty interesting take on it. I think in my case, I just really found Petit rubbed me the wrong way — both the real person and JGL’s interpretation (which is saying something since i always find Levitt such a warm presence in films). Maybe I went off on a tangent here, but . . . shit. Haha this was a weird movie for me. :\

  3. I sympathise with your misgivings Tom. The pre-wire walking stuff is definitely lacking in intrigue, and some of the dialogue is really corny (even if lines such as “you’ve given soul…” etc. were employed with good heartedness). And indeed, if you know the story, there isn’t much narrative tension. Great write-up mate!

  4. Nice review Tom; from the sounds of things I’ll be making the right call by waiting til this hits Netflix…and then fast forwarding to the last half-hour or so.

    • Cheers Dave, yeah at least the rental gives you the power to do all the fast-forwarding you want. Haha. The walk itself, yes, it’s well-filmed, the story is so lacking though. A shame. Man on Wire definitely is superior.

  5. Great read mate. i was going to see an advance screening of this but decided against it, as I was only interested in the 3D effects. Sounds like I made a wise choice!

    • Hey thanks a lot buddy, to be honest paying for a 3D ticket would be the way to go. I’m sure the walk would have been much more intense with the added dimension but as I’ve said before, I just can’t ever justify paying almost double the price to see a single movie. And either way, glasses or no glasses, the film’s tone still would be weird. This was like being at the circus, quite literally.

      • Yeah 3D is a rip-off. I saw Everest in 3D and found it underwhelming. Plus an Aussie doco just came out called Sherpa which shits all over Everest.

        I had to laugh at your last line. Literally like being at a circus, haha! Maybe I should smoke some green and go in for the circus atmosphere!! 😉

Comments are closed.