Kill Your Darlings


Release: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 (limited)


Harry drops out of Hogwarts to start attending Columbia University — good idea?

Probably one of the easier observations anyone is going to make when referring to Kill Your Darlings, a film that tips its hat to the romantics who inspired a literary revolution both stylistically and philosophically, is the fact that it does indeed feature Daniel Radcliffe in one of the lead roles. The next largest elephant in the room has to be Dane DeHaan, whose impressive performance earlier in the year in The Place Beyond the Pines, an epic story spanning several generations of family, garnered him a great deal of praise very quickly. As it turns out, the attention was well-deserved. DeHaan is equally brilliant — if not more so — as he bolsters his career further in this film involving hipsters. . . .before hipsters were actually hipsters*.

Kill Your Darlings‘ tightly-knit plot sorts through the intricate relationships amongst the young poets Allen Ginsberg (Radcliffe), Lucien Carr (DeHaan), Jack Keruoac (Jack Huston) and William Burroughs (Ben Foster), and how these relationships grew and evolved over the disquieting years in the wake of World War II. A singular event casts a shadow over the futures of these writers when the murder of an outsider, the older David Kammerer (Dexter’s Michael C. Hall), implicates Ginsberg, Carr and Burroughs during the ensuing police investigation in 1944.

The mention of hipsters that surfaced a little while ago is not really accurate. The writers who inspired what came to be known later as the Beat Generation — Ginsberg’s most famous piece, ‘Howl,’ Burrough’s ‘Naked Lunch’ and Karuoac’s ‘On the Road’ being the most notable examples of these times — intentionally went against the grain in an effort to expose the claustrophobic amour-propre of the time. No longer was poetry to suffer the restrictions of rhyme and meter, or anything else that was declared as traditional, societally-accepted forms of expressionism. ‘Hipster’ is a bit of a misnomer because the Beat Generation may be more naturely associated with the peace/hippie movements of the 60s and 70s.

However, it was the attitudinal divergence that makes such a comparison to contemporary hipsters easy to make. Ginsberg, Burroughs and, in particular Carr, discounted traditional methods of storytelling and instead pushed for less restrictions in the constructions thereof, leaning more towards open, honest and potentially graphic interpretations of the human experience.

With hindsight, Radcliffe and DeHaan seem to be ideal actors to personify such ambitious types. While Ginsberg was certainly more of the quieter, more easily intimidated of the two, Carr had no issues whatsoever in flaunting publicly his disdain for the institutions that were. DeHaan plays this up terrifically, and we have a great deal of fun reveling in his casting-out of mainstream society. Radcliffe settles into his post-Potter role with grace as well, at once demonstrating the intense love he had for Lucien while at the same time revealing his own personal fragilities. Ginsberg went to college, leaving behind a mother (played by Jennifer Jason Leigh) who was mentally ill and a father with wandering eyes. He also found his new home at Columbia University extremely intimidating, a reality that Radcliffe acknowledges behind glasses exceptionally well.

In many ways, John Krokidas’ debut film recalls the passion of dare-to-live films like Dead Poets Society, Good Will Hunting, and October Sky. Its cast is possessed with those same feverish desires to escape and expand beyond the oppressive powers and circumstances that are already in place; the settings and locations are just as romantic and timeless. Desperate actions occur at the most inopportune of moments. But the thing that sets Krokidas’ work apart is a clever blend of the artistic and the lawful. The events that take place in these semi-turbulent times play out much like a murder-mystery, yet they bear all the trademarks of a romance piece. It’s an effective, lively blend of genres that makes for a quick hour and forty-five minutes of viewing.

While the film ultimately doesn’t draw the most grandiose of conclusions from what transpires, it doesn’t necessarily have to. History has already been made and here, Krokidas is trying to recreate it using film as the medium. Clearly there are liberties to be taken along the way, and it’s unlikely that each and every aspect to Darlings is completely untainted by a director wanting to dramatize certain elements for entertainment’s sake, but the combination works deliciously well.


3-5Recommendation: Some are going to view this is as a stuffy film (if they’ve even heard of it), but I urge those people to give it a chance. It involves some delightful characters, simultaneously making great use of its young actors in Radcliffe and DeHaan, while respectfully paying tribute to some of America’s most transformative writers. This forthcoming comment is going to sound limiting, but if you enjoyed Robin Williams and his secretive Dead Poets Society, you will be guaranteed to fall in love with this as well. There’s a palpable joy and love in both narratives that is difficult to shake after watching.

Rated: R

Running Time: 104 mins.

Quoted: “Another lover hits the universe, the circle is broken.”

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited.

Photo credits:;

21 thoughts on “Kill Your Darlings

  1. Movies about literary types can be very limiting, although I did enjoy, for instance, Wonder Boys. I’m pleased Radcliffe has broken out of playing that other bespectacled laddie. Nicely done.


    • Cheers man. Did you enjoy things like Dead Poets Society? Stuff as well, but incredibly acted. The same applies here, under perhaps even darker tones. I enjoyed it quite a lot.


    • DeHaan is amazing here. I am a sucker for ‘stuffiness’ I suppose, as I quite enjoyed this. Hipsters, n such. . . 😛


  2. I freaking LOVE Dane DeHaan and would see this for him alone. I really, really want to see this. Also, Radcliffe is always worth checking out when it isn’t Potter related, he isn’t awful. I quite liked him in The Woman In Black.

    Yeah, Chris really has to make a return!

    I sincerely hope I get my hands on this somewhere and soon!


    • I enjoyed this quite a bit. Then again, I’m a sucker for things like Dead Poets Society and such, so I maybe took to it more. I hope you do, I’ll be seeking the review out just as soon! 😀


  3. Dane DeHaan’s greatest performance thus far on his burgeoning acting career. They don’t call him “the next Leonardo DiCaprio” for nothing.


    • Holy cow, that is some high praise! But I can see it. . . he was stride-for-stride great in both these films. Do you recommend some others that he’s been in, or is this pretty much it?


  4. Great review Tom! I’m impressed by Radcliffe in that he seeks out challenging roles post HP without sneering at the franchise that made him famous. I was impressed by Dane DeHaan in Chronicle as well. You mentioned Dead Poets Society which I loved when I saw it years ago, I’ll definitely be renting this one.


  5. I’m not such a fan of these real-life figures, however, the movie did well in making put-up with them for a small amount of time. Anything longer than this movie, however, I’m afraid would have been torture for both my eyes and ears. Such pretentious little douchebags. Good review Tom.


    • haha although I can’t identify with your dislike of the subject, I understand it. it can be pretentious. It worked for me because there was a lot of similarities to things like DPS and the other films i Mentioned up above. Appreciate it man.


  6. That’s a very positive review. Makes me look forward to seeing this. 😉

    I’m curious … Why the 6/8? The praise you award it made me expect a higher score.


    • haha because at the end of the day it didn’t really “reach.” it very much stayed well within its own comfort zone and ended rather appropo. It was a very solid movie, but nothing sensational, as a 7 and 8/8 indicate.


Comments are closed.