TBT: A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

Screen Shot 2013-10-24 at 2.45.59 PM

I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see the number of my followers drop after I admit that today’s entry is a movie I had never seen until now. . . Somehow, some way this classic from the mid-80s has eluded me. I can report that after all this time this movie remains just as terrifying as it was when first exposed to audiences in the day. Its easy to look past the dated acting, corny dialogue, and campy 80s effects because the story here is just so thrilling, and quite honestly scary. I had a blast with this TBT. ’twas a much more memorable one than last week’s, that’s to be sure. 

Today’s food for thought: A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984). 



Release: June 1, 1984


No rest for the mentally disturbed/possibly stalked. . .

The spirit of a vicious child serial killer resurfaces in the nightmares of teens in modern-day and is responsible for their subsequent and shocking deaths in this tense, spooky thriller from who else, but Wes Craven (I’m actually not that familiar at all with his style, but since this is a horror film for the ages I figured I’d best get ahead and jump on the bandwagon as quick as possible to make up for lost time).

I think it’s a general desire to distance myself from having too many nightmares myself that kept me away from this vintage piece of cinema. You will not find me in my most comfortable state during scenes of teeth-grinding suspense and dramatically low-lit, creepy stalking sequences, but I had to make an exception here. Craven’s direction is superb, fully taking advantage of a disturbing premise and several buckets of blood syrup to create scene after scene that’s filled with dread, suspense and gore in ways that are rarely seen in today’s horror offerings. Within the first ten-ish minutes, I yearned immediately for a time machine to go back in time and just have horror films like this exist and nothing else — this, coming from a non-horror movie watcher. I’m sure that I’ve said this often enough, I just want to make it even more clear how much fun this movie is.

After Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp) experiences the death of her friend Tina, she’s not fully convinced it was the murder that everyone understands it to be, and sooner rather than later she finds herself deeply personally involved in the mystery also, and the dream world she goes to when sleeping starts to blur with the real world.

Years ago, a terrible hat-wearing man (yes his hat was terrible) who killed children was tracked down by enraged parents, who then cornered him in a basement and set fire to the house. Now he lives on in the nightmares of other kids living on Elm Street, killing children as his revenge. With each passing day and seeing more and more disturbing things in her dreams, Nancy is increasingly scared to go to sleep and her mother (horror regular Ronee Blakely) becomes increasingly worried about her daughter’s mental state. Finally enough is enough for Nancy, and she becomes determined to both prove that Freddie is indeed still alive (no one believes her since, well. . you know. . . he was a pariah from yesteryear and is long gone now), and that she is not insane. Nancy makes attempts several times to have someone watch over her as she sleeps and attempts to drag her monstrous stalker from the dream world to the real one so the terrorizing can be stopped, once and for all.


The Dreams:

  1. A very young Johnny Depp, as Nancy’s boyfriend, Glen Lentz. His big-screen debut.
  2. The bedroom scenes and “I’m your boyfriend now, Nancy. . .”
  3. Charles Bernstein’s score is really damn cool and suitably eerie.
  4. The fact that Freddy Krueger is played by an actor (Robert Englund). Thank god this guy isn’t real. . . . . . .right?
  5. There’s a heavy use of cheesy 80s props/effects here but they are so well-used these have ended up scarring me temporarily. Hopefully I’ll recover in a few days.

The Nightmares:

  1. Some acting bits are pretty questionable but in general these don’t even really bring the intensity down. Also, it is a film from the 80s. I should probably have expected a bit of camp in the dialogue every now and then.
  2. The fact there are so many sequels to this that I will likely never watch because I have this general understanding of how terrible they are.
  3. How dumb must you be to stay in the same town after you’re being suspected of murdering your girlfriend? (Rod Lane, I’m talking to you.) Why didn’t you just blow dodge? Hiding in the bushes, and then whispering to a passing-by Nancy doesn’t seem to be a terrible effective way of hiding yourself from the cops. I think he would have avoided his death if he hadn’t been so foolish.
  4. The ultimate show-down between Nancy and Freddy was a little silly. I was actually hoping for something more, but it still worked.
  5. The ending!!!!!! I am a person who appreciate finality, having some knowledge of things being over, whatever. Uh, this didn’t really satisfy that, but at the same time its not a bad ending at all. I’m very, very torn on how A Nightmare on Elm Street goes out. Still, I refuse to see the sequels.


Well, that’s it. That about wraps us up for this disturbing week on Throwback Thursday. Thanks for revisiting this one with me, and for still reading after I told you it took me almost 30 years to see it.


4-0Recommendation: Simply a classic, Craven’s low-budget and extra-creepy psychological thriller is both atmospheric and unnerving, and should be a permanent installment in any horror fan’s list of films to watch in the run-up to Halloween.

Rated: R

Running Time: 91 mins.

All content originally published and the reproduction elsewhere without the expressed written consent of the blog owner is prohibited. 

Photo credits: http://www.pophorror.com; http://www.imdb.com 

17 thoughts on “TBT: A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

  1. Now this is one I have yet to see, which I’m ashamed to say. My local cinema is showing this on Halloween so will have to remedy that! Excellent work as usual mate.


    • wow haha more folks are in the same boat as me then, not having seen it before. I threw that out there in order to inculpate myself with only the two or three others on the planet who hadn’t seen this classic, but looks like such admissions weren’t necessary! for shame, Mark. for shame. get on it. 😛


    • hahaha, see, I told you! All but predictable. I guess I’ll go ahead and un-friend you, too. Now we’re even. 😉


  2. Great review man. It is so hard to see every film that people consider ‘classics’. I only caught this for the first time last year, and like you am a really very big fan. One of my favourite horror films


    • *whew* well that’s a relief, I’ve had a few people now tell me not to panic. lol. just figured I’d finally get around to truly doing a “throwback” on here, so here it is. And a good one, too. Not so much a horror fan myself but I think I’m slowly starting to become one. After all this time. Damn it. haha!


  3. Damn straight! This was excellent! And you are forgiven – I mean you have seen it now finally AND enjoyed it immensely 🙂 The corny dialogue is damned important hahahaha!

    “The fact that Freddy Krueger is played by an actor (Robert Englund). Thank god this guy isn’t real. . . . . . .right?” – Wes Craven’s New Nightmare… that is all that I will say. 😛

    Yeah, the sequels progressively get worse, and under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should you ever subject yourself to the 2010 remake. Why, just why?

    Halloween? I am so in for this.


    • New Nightmare I thought was kind of a parody?? Is it a serious horror film?? My god, I could barely stand it when we went into the dream sequences in this movie, not sure I could do another round of that!!! 😉 I can tell Zoe might be a fan of a particular Wes Craven director. Or is it just this movie? (I can understand the love for it now)


      • It was supposed to be a DEAD SERIOUS reboot. No, the New one has crap dream sequences and completely desecrated everything that was Freddy Krueger. I HATED it. It was even my Shitfest entry…so bad you CRINGE. I loved Elm Street but I also like Wes Craven, he really isn’t bad 😀 I am so thrilled to hear that you enjoyed this.


      • oh it was your Shitfest entry?? uh-oh!! Going back to check that out pronto! 🙂

        Yeah i really did enjoy it. Loved it, actually


Comments are closed.